04Issues & decisionsIngersoll

Ingersoll · Explain yourself

$38 million. What is the full recreation-centre bill?

Ingersoll’s new recreation centre has a headline price. Servicing, fundraising, borrowing and yearly running costs need one clear explanation.

01 / The fact

$38mMURC construction figure in the May 2026 procurementThe procurement describes the recreation building. It does not provide a complete campus financing and lifetime-cost account.
38,000,000 CADCentre construction figure — May procurement
1,862,203.94 CAD2025 surplus allocated to Arena Facility Reserve — August 10
MURC fundraising-consultant procurement

02 / The power

Who can decide?

Ingersoll controls its recreation facility and Town servicing commitments. County infrastructure and school-board work require their own decisions and funding.

Meet the decision-makers

MURC fundraising-consultant procurement

03 / The choice

What is the trade-off?

  1. Proceed with a full funding ledger — proposalThe Town must explain who carries fundraising or cost-overrun risk and which costs sit outside the building figure.
  2. Tie optional scope to secured funding — proposalSome amenities could open later. Show any redesign cost and the effect on users before changing scope.

04 / A follow-up worth asking

What is the current all-in cost, how much funding is secured, and what yearly cost will residents carry once the doors open?

Holding office means explaining the choice.

Ask this follow-upRead positions on this issue

05 / Your move

Keep the question alive.

Publish the current construction and servicing milestones alongside donations received, financing drawn and the expected opening. No new opening date is asserted here.

I want an answer

By the people. For the people.

Who else should see this?

See the decision.

A building price is only part of the picture

01Recreation building

$38m procurement figure

02Roads & servicing

Show the separate costs

03Funding

Show what is secured

04Every year after opening

Show the operating cost

MURC fundraising-consultant procurement

Pick a plan. Explain the trade-off.

What would you choose?

Choices to question · not a public vote or a list of approved projects.

Proceed with a full funding ledger — proposal

What it could achieveKeep the project moving while showing construction, servicing, donations, borrowing and annual operating costs in one place.

The trade-offThe Town must explain who carries fundraising or cost-overrun risk and which costs sit outside the building figure.

Make the case for this choice

Tie optional scope to secured funding — proposal

What it could achieveSet a clear limit on what the Town will fund before additional contributions arrive.

The trade-offSome amenities could open later. Show any redesign cost and the effect on users before changing scope.

Make the case for this choice

Same issue. Same opportunity to explain.

Where do they stand?

What is the complete cost, funding and delivery plan for the campus?

15 people

An absent public answer is not a refusal. Delivery and responses are recorded on the public question.

Open the full candidate comparison

Open public question

Put the question to them.

What is the complete cost, funding and delivery plan for the campus?

The record stays here

What happened. What happens next.

  1. Servicing prequalification closed

    Procurement described the larger recreation, school and housing parcel. Prequalification did not award construction.

  2. $38m building figure published

    The fundraising-consultant procurement described a $38m recreation centre.

  3. Fundraising consultancy awarded

    Council awarded the capital-campaign consultancy to Interkom and raised its appropriation to $290,000.

  4. Financing applications authorized

    Council authorized applications for the centre and Clarke Road work. The applications are not proof of borrowing drawn.

  5. $1.862m directed to arena reserve

    Resolution 2026-212 allocated the 2025 operating surplus to the Arena Facility Reserve.

Next to watch

Publish the current construction and servicing milestones alongside donations received, financing drawn and the expected opening. No new opening date is asserted here.

Meetings & agendas
Open the documentsMURC fundraising-consultant procurementAugust 10 Council minutes — resolution 2026-212June 8 Council minutes — consultancy awardJune 16 Council minutes — financing applicationsClarke Road servicing prequalificationThe full issue recordCorrect this page or add a source

Got a stronger alternative?

Name the change. Show what it costs. Explain what it gives up.

Put your idea forward
Who’s actually in charge?
01

Ingersoll council

Municipal services, local roads, recreation, zoning and the local budget.

Explore this level →
02

Oxford County

County roads, water and wastewater, housing services, paramedics and County planning.

Explore this level →

Meet your representatives